The judges have asked all of us entrants to answer a couple of questions about our perception of our entries to the contest, and I thought that I would share my answers here:
What deficiency or opportunity did you see - with respect to published financial data analysis - that drove your idea for an application using XBRL?The relatively high barrier to entry. Building an XBRL-aware application today means that XML parsing code must be written, after which the XBRL validation rules must be encoded and tested. The opportunity I see with Gepsio is one in which the parsing and validation logic is packaged in a ready-to-use assembly that can be picked up and used by others to build application and value-added logic, thereby dramatically lowering the barrier to entry for XBRL developers. It also opens the door for PowerShell users to write “XBRL scripts” without ever encoding low-level XML and XBRL details.The winner of the contest is judged by a panel of judges, although a People's Choice vote is also being held for another week or so. If you feel compelled to vote for Gepsio in this People's Choice competition, head on over to the XBRL US Challenge page and click on the "Vote for the Best XBRL App" link in the upper right-hand section titled "XBRL Challenge Judges".
What was the moment you enjoyed most during this competition?I have enjoyed seeing Gepsio used and embraced by others. I put Gepsio up on Codeplex to little fanfare, unsure of what might become of it. To see it used by others – to see the project followed by other users on Codeplex; to see Gepsio mentioned in XBRL answers on the Stack Overflow Web site; to get emails from people using it – all of it makes the effort worthwhile. It’s validation that what Gepsio offers fills a need as yet untapped by the current developer tool space, and that is very gratifying.
Good luck to all Challenge participats!